Again I ask, “Why does a person repent after committing a sin?”
Answers vary. But I maintain that if you are repenting so that you can get back to being good then you are repenting for the wrong reasons and will soon enough find yourself smack-dab back in the same situation that warranted your original confession in the first place.
And that has it’s downside. Because if we repent time and time again, and time and time again fall into the same despicable behavior, it wont be long until we see it as an endless loop, a casual cycle of give and take, without any real expectation that we could ever be delivered from the sin that so easily besets.
So, why does a person repent? Because we were bad? To do better? To realign ourselves with the moral code?
Even though we live in the New Covenant of Grace I am increasingly convinced that most of the church operates in what I call a burning bush mentality. You remember the burning bush. It was the vessel wherein Moses received his call to ministry and the place where he received the law. God’s desire was that he would have a people who would worship him, have relationship with him; a people he could call his own and there would be a real sense of intimacy between he and his people.
The gist intimacy was living within the law. If they obeyed Torah they enjoyed the blessing of God’s presence. If they didn’t, God withdrew from them until they were realigned with the precepts of the law. In this sense, intimacy with the Lord had to do with how the people obeyed or disobeyed the law. In short, it had to do with behaving, a code of conduct; or, to be precise: works.
Few people enjoyed intimacy with God back then. Moses did. He spoke with God as a friend. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the OT prophets enjoyed rich fellowship in the Spirit with him as well. By and large it went like this: if you were living according to the Law you were experiencing God’s favor. If you weren’t, you weren’t.
I remember standing under a waterfall once. It came right down from heaven and splashed me on the top of my head. If I was to move outside of the stream it went dry. That’s the way it was back then. Step out of the stream and you run dry. The stream, in that case, was the Law.
But all that didn’t work. We have learned since then that the Law kills. Like a cancer, it gets under our skin and can kill us. Jesus flipped it all around and, in essence, said, “I still want to be your God, you still have a tendency to sin. You’ve probably learned that it’s impossible to keep the Law, so believe in me, the Fulfillment of the Law, and all the privileges set aside for those who would keep the Law, will be yours through faith.”
He’s saying we can’t do it. He can. Believe in him and you will receive what you don’t deserve. So now it’s a whole different deal. Back then it was all about keeping the moral code. Today it’s all about Grace. Grace infuses the personality of God into our hearts. In Grace we have become true children of God, intimate with our Father, as we place our faith in Jesus Christ.
Grace is the new burning bush. We no longer take our righteousness from tablets of stone, but through the Holy Spirit as written by the same finger who wrote the commandments, only this time they are written in our hearts.
So what is the place of the Law in this new day and age? The Law is no longer essential for salvation but has become a natural by-product of the person who walks in the love that has been poured out upon us through the Holy Spirit. Let me be clear here - as it plays into something I’ll state below. A person cannot be saved by keeping the Law. The embers of the burning bush have faded away and now a new Way has been revealed. It is only by grace that we are saved. The Law, if taken too devotionally, will wind up killing us.
The Law hems us in, it reveals the parameters of righteous behavior - very much like speed limit signs provide safe parameters on the road. It is still a good thing. But is still cannot save. We are privy to the intimacy of God through grace and nothing else. We may feel better if we’ve been good. We may pat ourselves on the back and say “good job” when overcoming a temptation with the Love of God. All fine and well. But keeping the Law has little to do with getting saved.
Back then, when a person sinned, it was evident. Their behavior gave them away. Today it’s not so clear. Why? Because sin becomes more than the breaching of a moral code. It is getting out of sync with the intimacy of God. It is the moving away from the sweetness of fellowship found exclusively within the marital-like relationship between Parent and child.
When I sin I grieve the loss of intimacy and relationship with my Father, not the fact of what thing I did or didn’t do. That’s how a person can sin and not do (or do) a thing. I don’t have to commit adultery to sin. The mere thought of adultery is enough to strain my intimacy with God. It’s that sensitive.
Jesus makes reference to this when he shares with the religious leaders that, though the outside of the cup is clean, the inside of the cup is filled with dregs. What he meant by that was that they were doing all the right things - keeping the Law - but they were far from intimacy with God.
Now we all sin. We all move away from the sweet spot in Christ Jesus, regardless of what we do, or don’t, do. When we move away from that place, that place of abiding in the Spirit, we have sinned. When we sin, how do we get back into the sweet spot? How do we realign ourselves with the intimacy of God?
We call this repentance. When a person repents he or she decides in the mind to realign oneself with the grace falling from above. It’s a simple process, really. It is a reevaluation of the breach, a recognition of the fruit of the breach, and a repositioning of oneself back in the sweet spot of the Waterfall, if you will. It demands humility and honesty. In the best case scenario, a person repents and draws back to God because of the loss of intimacy and friendship he or she once had but has no more. “I remember my Father’s house,” we say. “I am longing for the delicacies from the table, the sweetness of being back home, and just to be hugged in the arms of my Father. I am so thirsty for that which I have lost.”
Again I pose the question: When you repent, what is at the heart of your desire to repent? Is it to be back in good standing with God? Is it so that you won’t flub it up again? Is it so that, by getting back into proper behavior, you can once again live within the favor of the Divine?
Careful here. For it is a very subtle difference. It is tempting to repent back to the principals given us in the burning bush, tempting to repent to get it right. Right? I repent to do better. I repent because I fell short. For sure we all repent because we got something wrong. But that something wrong is far deeper that merely the doing or not dong of a thing. That something wrong is the drifting away from intimacy in Christ. The doing or not doing of the thing is simply the fruit of intimacy lost. The loss of moral compass from True North is the first breach, the real sin here. The stuff that we fall into as a result of that is secondary.
The problem with most repentance today is that it appeals to the stuff that we should have done or should not have done and not to the reestablishment of intimacy with Jesus. We already know that we can be doing all things right and be standing outside the Waterfall. The Pharisees did all things proper, yet their hearts were far from God. Even though he was standing right in front of them they recognized him not. For their fleshly passion of the written word blinded them from seeing the Living Light of the world.
O, but to repent back to intimacy! What a blessed gift that is! To be reunited with my Creator as Adam was before Eden’s Fall. That is the goal of true repentance. When that is achieved the Law becomes the wake of my boat, the ripples expanding out from the pebble’s splash, and the joy that comes from God’s abundant life. It’s not that the Law is bad. But Sinai’s tree is smoldering. It has been replaced with the New Wood of Grace which, when fully embraced, contains the very DNA of the original bush.
Intimacy? Found in Jesus Christ and his gift for us. Moral code - works and behavior? The fruit of that relationship.
Sin? Moving away from the sweet spot of living in the Spirit. The breaking of the Law, works of unrighteousness and works of the flesh are a horrific by-product of the one who has lost intimacy with their God.
Repentance? Choosing to realign oneself with the outflow of God’s love found in the Grace of Jesus Christ. It is not an appeal to a higher Law, or even asking God for the power to keep you from doing the stupid thing again - for those prayers will go unanswered and be un-empowered anyway if not first posed within the Spirit of God. Ideal repentance makes its appeal to the love of God, not the Law of God; the wood of the Cross, not the wood of the bush. It makes its appeal to Mount Calvary, not Mount Sinai. To Grace, and not works.
The true repenter understands that only when he or she is in right standing with God - standing within the love of God as poured out in the Holy Spirit - that the code of behavior will be attained, and that with such a glorious radiance and natural innocence that those who know not the sweetness of God will be drawn to it, through the fragrance of the redeemed, through Grace.